Select Page

Seminal events that play over extended periods of time can cast transformational long-term effects on global economic systems. The Industrial Revolution was one such event that molded, dominated, and transformed the commercial, scientific, and industrial development of the British economy more than 200 years ago. A range of inputs that included scientific expertise, the widespread use of steam engines, powered, special-purpose machinery, and commercial collaborations powered it. The significant outputs of this revolution included the creation of large factories, mass production of consumer goods, and high levels of British participation in the economic and commercial life of the global economy. These facts underline the importance of input and output in the operation of large-scale phenomenon. In modern times, flowchart diagrams hinge on input and output as key actions that propagate the flow of events inside a process or system. The designers of flowcharts deploy parallelograms as the preferred shapes that denote various instances of input and output.

Momentum and velocity remain central factors that propel the flow of events inside a flowchart diagram. The input and output mechanisms positioned inside such illustrations allow the depicted process to gain steam and proceed toward completion. These mechanisms also serve as logic operators in a wider sense of these terms. For instance, a flowchart that seeks to decode temperature readings can include critical input and output framed inside the visual shapes of parallelograms. The designers can locate critical information inside said shapes that have descriptive value pertaining to a given set of temperatures. Information that precedes the output governs the nature of various outcomes. In the said instance, temperature values below (or above) a certain threshold generate specific output values. In light of the above, we may consider input and output as co-related information that cover a significant breadth of expanse inside a flowchart.

Rendering complex processes may require designers and creators to frame multiple sets of input and output within a flowchart diagram. The nature and expanse of complex processes determine the positioning of these factors inside a flowchart. Certain processes might be prefaced by sets of input and output, thereby setting the tone for the subsequent flows of information. However, observers note certain levels of input and output may remain external to the visible expanse of a diagram. Anachronistic as this may sound, the premise holds true; for instance, external sources of data or information may remain subject to changes driven by wider factors that remain outside the scope of a given illustration. Each of these changes acts as an input that determines the quality of output inside the visible expanse of a flowchart. Macro-economic factors, for example, represent one of the key inputs (read influencers) that should influence the flows and outcome values generated inside flowcharts depicting a commercial process.

Stationary objects (such as rocky outcrops, gardens, and urban jungles) represent certain elements that resist change. Similarly, constant phenomenon such as our perception of the heavens represents immobile (and immutable) factors that dominate the visual landscape in human lives. Certain versions of flowchart diagrams can echo said premise when designers trace multiple in-diagram connections to fixed locations that signify inputs. For instance, a creator can position a query that interrogates a depicted process to unearth value creation. This can be positioned at the end of a commercial flowchart in a bid to evaluate the dollar value of outcomes that flow from preceding flows. Multiple outcomes may flow from such locations, thereby adding a new dimension of the concept of input and output inside a flowchart diagram. In addition, said outcomes can impart direction to commercial operators wherein they may variously elect to initiate specific actions based on the nature of each outcome. This illustration clearly throws light on the relevance of input and output in certain processes.

Blank spaces may elicit a quizzical response from most observers; this reaction frames the human tendency to classify all manner of visible artifacts in line with an individual observer’s tastes, preferences, notions, pre-conceptions, experiences, and predilections. That said, blank spaces might emerge as the location of interesting dialogues or sites of exciting possibilities. The creators of flowcharts may craft blank stages inside an illustration in a bid to accommodate multiple scenarios, possibilities, situations, and unknown operators that may emerge in the future. In doing so, the creator is constructing a template that may serve as a point of congregation between the familiar and the unknown, between the tested and the experimental, between past, present and the future. For instance, blank stages that denote potential inputs can signify starting points that encourage process operators to explore the proverbial uncharted waters. Such an action imputes larger meaning (and injects fresh promise) into conventional concepts of input and output as they exist in the flowchart designer’s lexicon.

At a micro level, the concept of input and output inside a flowchart might denote an explanatory stance that helps observers decrypt the lines, shapes, flows, decisions, and assorted information that animate a flowchart diagram. Essentially, input points may emerge as dense clusters of information inside the spatial expanse of an illustration. These clusters may help detail a raft of conditions, attendant features, logical operators, and other markers of context. Such a visual may emerge when designers embark on creating a fine representation of a process flow diagram or when depicting the workings of a complicated supply chain mechanism. Intelligent observers can read the detailed manifestations of input and co-relate these to the operation of the process. Multiple such instances of input can assist readers to grasp the enormity of modern commercial, business, engineering, scientific, or technological processes. We may state such illustrations attain the hallowed status of modern blueprints that underlie the conception of future systems or processes.

The designers of modern industrial processes must pay close attention to actions that protect the natural environment. In line with this, designers can sketch flowcharts that commence at a graphical representation of a series of inputs (such as energy, time, human effort, raw materials, etc.). The input and output paradigm manifests in the subsequent interplay between these inputs and the multiple levels of processing that represent the core of the illustration. Output includes the main product (or products) and a slew of co-products that conform to the intended mechanics of the industrial process. We must appreciate the core processing mechanisms that convert the raw inputs into processed output – and its concomitant gains in commercial value. The input and output also represent the moving spirit that animates core sections of the depicted process, while generating tangible value at the terminal stages of the process. They represent significant aspects of the life cycle of the depicted process.

The foregoing paragraphs have discussed the various uses of input and output inside a modern flowchart. The designers of such illustrations must remain vigilant in terms of assigning importance to (and portraying) a wide range of valid inputs. Every input must accompany embellishment with sufficient information to justify its placement inside an illustration. Similarly, output – when adequately positioned – allows designers to project the correct outcomes that emerge from a depicted system. Further, intelligent designers may add notes to an illustration in a bid to bolster the relevance of multiple strands of input and output.