Explaining Workflow of Machine Learning Project with Flowchart

“Machine learning will increase productivity throughout the supply chain.” – Dave Waters

The evolution and progress of digital technologies continue to scale new landmarks. These technologies represent, in part, the many interfaces and avenues (of interaction and intersection) between the human intellect, virtual realms, and the real world. Digital technologies operate in and impact every domain of human endeavor in contemporary times; the effective application of digital can facilitate a variety of problem-solving initiatives – and present new methods of exploration and crafting effective solutions. Thus, machine learning – essentially a branch of artificial intelligence technologies and modern computer science – “focuses on the use of data and algorithms to imitate the way that humans learn, gradually improving its accuracy.

  • Defining Workflows in Machine Learning

Meanwhile, a workflow of machine learning “describes the processes involved in machine learning work. Various stages help to universalize the process of building and maintaining machine learning networks.” Experts aver the different aspects of machine learning workflow include “gathering data, pre-processing, researching, training and testing the model, and the process of post-evaluation.” Therefore, it would seem appropriate to examine and investigate the workflow of machine learning, and variations thereof, through the agency of connected diagrams, also known as flowcharts.

  • Leveraging Power of Interrogation

Stances mediated by interrogation can define the initial stages of the workflow of machine learning. Initial stances could be ascertained by posing questions to project teams tasked with developing workflows. Queries and questions may include assessments of available data to start a project, evaluating its sufficiency, and sourcing information/data from a variety of stakeholders relevant to projects. The questions could be formulated within the early stages of connected diagrams and the number of questions could determine the structure of diagrams and the process through which the workflow would emerge. Sub-sets of queries may distinguish the interrogation, thereby enabling the workflow of machine learning to proceed toward stated objectives. In this instance, flowcharts serve as platforms of enablement; these configurations of connected stages empower developers and architects to set the tenor of a machine learning project.

  • Role of Stakeholder Interactions

Multiple instances of interaction between software architects, data scientists, and business analysts are necessary to propel the workflow of machine learning. These interactions can spark reviews of raw data, the discovery of limitations within sets of available data, and discussions on the methods of crafting workflows. In this scenario, all stakeholders must assess the IT infrastructure allocated to said projects; this element remains key to ensure the success of endeavors focused on workflow of machine learning. Meanwhile, participants must list the business requirements that comprise the core objective of machine learning projects. Such action is essential because the (nature and scope of) requirements can determine the direction and pace of workflows. Therefore, it is possible to envisage flow-based diagrams as a primary mechanism that influences the design of workflow of machine learning processes and projects.

  • Multiplicity of Algorithms

Various editions/configurations of algorithm can assist data architects to assemble multiple models based on training datasets. The algorithm, therefore represents a key element of designing workflow of machine learning. Algorithms may be simple or complex, binary or distributed, generic or probabilistic. In addition, data science can devise custom algorithms for the benefit of projects. It would be possible to envisage different types of workflows within the spaces of flow-based diagrams. However, “there could be seasonal or sudden changes to the patterns in data that could deteriorate the model performance.” Bearing this in mind, data scientists may design multiple lines within algorithms in a bid to reinforce the functional aspects of machine learning systems. Additionally, scientists may establish connections (and calibrated convergences) between editions of algorithm as part of designing and developing projects.

  • ‘Cleaning’ Data for Better Operations

Actions geared toward exploring and cleaning data/digital information represent vital part of designing workflow of machine learning systems. This implies an overwhelming use of logic (and relevant technique) when we survey various sets of data; for instance, information rendered in terms of numbers should emerge as numbers, while dates – from a calendar, for instance – should find rendering as appropriate numerical representations. Architects may have to excise superfluous information in data sets as part of exploring and cleaning data for use in projects. The expanse and nature of such actions could be etched clearly in spaces of connected diagrams; sub-segments of connected illustration may enable design of different forms of workflow. Additionally, the design of workflow of machine learning may require additional actions that implement derivative strategies to clean large sets of data using specialized algorithms.

  • Benefits of ‘Cleaning’ Data Sets

Further to the above, architects may enumerate the benefits of cleaning data as part of projects designed to develop workflow of machine learning. Project personnel may develop separate flowcharts to spotlight fewer errors and inconsistencies when cleaning methods operate on multiple sources and sets of data. Data cleaning also enables scientists to map different data functions efficiently, allowing projects to register substantial progress. Cleaning techniques also enable architects to standardize development processes, build greater diversity in machine learning projects, and validate the accuracy of data sets. The benefits of data cleaning extend to enhanced ability to develop variations in workflow of machine learning, thereby driving the emergence of higher quality in project outcomes. The resultant workflows operate smoothly, triggering client delight and happier customers.

  • Idea of Validation in Machine Learning

Validating the trained model is necessary to ensure the model meets original codified objectives.” In line with this, machine learning experts may choose certain parameters as part of developing workflow of machine learning. Subsequently, they may test the performance of the model and derive the errors that emanate from performance. A detailed flow-based diagram may express the various aspects of this validation exercise; multiple scenarios could be etched to validate whether trained models operate under high or low bias. Data scientists could elect to feed additional sets of data to machine learning models as part of efforts to improve the performance of trained models. Those in charge of the projects could develop/deploy various editions and configurations of the flowchart as part of developing validation exercises.

  • To Conclude

These lines of exploration/analysis point to certain methods of developing workflow of machine learning. As part of innovation and experimentation, it would help to build different versions of flowcharts to drive key aspects of modern machine learning projects and exercises. The utility of these two-dimensional constructs primarily resides in equipping developers with visual tools. Large versions of diagrams could also promote collaboration among developers and architects –this would be the original spur that drives innovation in project design and performance. Certain observers aver flowcharts also empower new thinking in terms of devising solutions in this domain – for instance, revisions and re-engineering initiatives could find clear expression within spaces of connected diagrams. It would help to review revisions as a method that imparts finesse to engineering projects.

Further, it would help to embellish basic structures of flowcharts with analytical devices, such as pie charts, tables, graphs, and gradients. This choice of action expands the possibilities inherent within flow-based visual structures. In addition, such actions empower architects and developers to build greater detail into flow-based diagrams, design streamlined workflows, explore the intricacies of machine learning technologies, and experiment with new ideas, theories, and strategies. It would thus, help to consider flowcharts harbingers of new horizons in tech-driven paradigms, systems, and processes.

Create interactive decision trees for customer service management, cold call scripts or self-service. Improve sales performance metrics and customer delight across your call centers.

Interactive Decision Tree