Select Page

“Learning experiences are like journeys. The journey starts where the learning is now and ends where the learner is more successful. The end of the journey isn’t knowing more, its doing more.” – Julie Dirksen

Workforce management has emerged as a primary concept that promotes the efficient use of human resources inside modern organizations. The optimal use of highly skilled workforces enables organizations to maintain a ready stance in competitive landscapes, service client assignments on a war footing, offer distinct elements of value addition through a range of service propositions, and respond better to the evolving demands of complex projects and long-term assignments. The modern organization must ideate and invest resources wisely to train new employees, build new areas of competencies, design active learning systems, and enroll the use of visual paradigms – such as flowcharts – to drive training programs and employee skilling initiatives. The drive to train new employees remains a constant impulse, one that arises from the core rationale that powers the existence of modern organizations. Outcomes of effective employee training reflect heavily in the perceptions of clients, the ability of organizations to court new business, and in the development of critical strengths that bolster the performance levels of contemporary organizations.

Visual techniques that hinge on detailed narratives sketched inside flowcharts can help organizations to train new employees. Such techniques could include the depiction of decomposed processes positioned as a succession of stages. This stance allows new employees to gain high levels of basic familiarity with the intricacies of systems and processes. In addition, flowcharts designed to train new employees must utilize colors and visual structures in the interests of framing/driving a sustained visual narrative. These elements boost engagement with trainees, promote dialogue between trainers and their wards, encourage questions in the minds of new employees, and contribute to the creation of effective learning mechanisms. Advanced versions of flowcharts can empower organizations to transmit the intricacies of complex processes, thereby elevating the levels of training outcomes. In light of these observations, we could state designers of flowcharts must embrace multiple techniques in the creation of such illustrations.

Cross sections of processes can find representation inside special editions of illustrations as part of the mission to expand awareness of the workforce and to train new employees. Such a technique must find careful consideration in the minds of trainers prior to actual implementation inside training programs. Pursuant to this stance, trainers and process specialists could collaborate to create extensive visual representations of the inner workings of processes, the rationale that powers the structure/design of processes, the moving parts that animate the external manifestation of processes, and the varieties of operational layers encased inside depicted processes. Therefore, cross sections allow trainers to impress fundamental information in the minds of fresh talents as part of campaigns to train new employees. A sequence of cross sections allows trainees to appreciate the early/end stages of business processes, thus equipping them to discharge assigned duties in real world conditions.

A steady stream of verbal commentary/elucidation could usefully complement the visual narrative that emerges in the expanses of training flowcharts. This approach could reinforce initiatives to train new employees in a variety of contexts; these contexts include employee re-training programs, refresher training sessions, Q&A sessions explicitly designed to remove ambiguity from minds of trainees and employees, executive training programs, re-skilling initiatives undertaken by organizations, among others. In line with this, trainers must originate commentary that matches the visual emanating from sections of flowcharts. This technique can accelerate programs to train new employees because it draws on the experience of trainers in operating business processes; such methods also enable trainers to establish rapport with new employees, thereby injecting a human element into corporate training paradigms undertaken by modern organizations. Further, research indicates such programs output higher cost effective quotient in different training scenarios.

Knowledge exchange mechanisms – when appended to original programs designed to train new employees – could significantly boost outcomes for trainers and sponsor organizations. These mechanisms could find expression through hand-holding programs that bring together sets of new employees and seasoned veterans that hold deep domain knowledge of systems and processes. We may view such mechanisms as extensions of programs to train new employees, bolster the knowledge-based capabilities of organizations, and improve the performance of average employees over long-term horizons. In addition, knowledge exchange paradigms find enrichment through the agency of independent consultants and external specialists that contribute reviews/insights to training programs, thereby strengthening the sinews of performance inside organizations. Flowcharts could serve as platforms that enable organizations to design hybrid training programs inside campaigns to train new employees.

Customized training modules hold significant potential when implemented through visual techniques such as flowcharts. Businesses could elect to train new employees through custom modules designed by expert trainers and process specialists. Some modules could emerge in the form of cause-and-effect demonstrations that allow new employees to gain firm grasp on the basics of business/commercial systems and processes. These flowcharts could offer compact forms of content that encourage discussions among trainees and trainers, spark voyages of discovery and common learning during training sessions – thereby driving participatory learning processes. In addition, custom modules could undergo upgrades to include the latest knowledge and updated process information; this allows modules to retain continuing relevance in training sessions conducted over the years. Further, custom modules could form the cornerstones of interventions designed to train new employees and seasoned associates alike.

Evaluating the outcomes of employee training programs remains a crucial aspect of activities inside the modern organization. A novel form of evaluation takes shape when trainees/new employees are required to present their learnings through flowcharts based on given case studies. This technique can be refined in a variety of ways, and employee submissions can undergo assessment as part of evaluation mechanisms. The flowcharts can form the bedrock of any questions posed to new employees, demonstrate their understanding of subject matters; in addition, the act of creating flowcharts acts as a tool that drives the absorption of knowledge in the minds of new employees. We may note such techniques to train new employees posit new thinking in the domain of designing modern training and evaluation programs. Such techniques may undergo evolution through the application of insights that may emerge in the minds of coaches/trainers/instructors, etc.

An active engagement with the ideas and thoughts encased above compels readers to consider the use of flowcharts in designing training programs. Every organization must invest resources in campaigns to train new employees as part of methods to promote excellence in performance. The imaginative/exploratory use of flowchart diagrams provides momentum to such campaigns, helps refresh the energies inherent in human workforces, and expands the scope for success in training outcomes. The use of digital extends gains that accrue from these techniques; digital allows trainers to commence dialogues with large sets of employees dispersed around the globe. We may therefore view digital as superb enabler that amplifies the impact of training programs.

Further to the above, trainers could utilize the agency of flowcharts to etch different segments of contemporary training programs ahead of such events. The structured positioning of information inside flowcharts allows instructors to plan the depth and scope of said programs, calibrate their interventions in the course of training sessions, and build innovative ideas into the ongoing administration of flowchart-enabled initiatives/programs. In promoting such scenarios, we may view the multiple lines of utility enshrined in the modern flowchart.