Inter-office Goal-setting and Information Sharing with Flowcharts

“Synergy – the bonus that is achieved when things work together harmoniously.” – Mark Twain

The definitions and ideas that describe work and the modern workplace have evolved over recent decades; observers have noted factors – such as flexibility in work routines, pronounced use of technologies, an expanding presence of the informal economy, and specialization in knowledge and skillsets – that are increasingly bookending the idea of work in modern labor markets. The quality of performance remains a key consideration that governs outcomes in the workplace. The setting of goals and objectives continues to remain a key mechanism that spurs the performance of individual associates and teams of workers. Therefore, it would help to consider inter-office goal-setting as a subsidiary tactic that can potentially assist work teams to distinguish themselves. The contours of such activity require planning and intelligent effort, and line managers or supervisors could utilize flowcharts to outline these goals.

  • Coping with Challenges

Workplace goals can include the delineation of multiple challenges and factors that hinder staff performance. It would be possible to utilize the agency of flowcharts to develop visibility into potential challenges and etch possible methods of resolution. For instance, flawless communication across the layers of an organization can feature prominently in an inter-office Goal-setting flowchart. Communication may include face-to-face meetings, group email inboxes, instant communication through chat modules, (digital) fireside conversations, bulletin boards, among others. The combined use of these methods can elevate the quality of team communications, thereby enabling faster progress toward objectives in the workplace. Each work location of an organization can participate in this version of the inter-office goal-setting exercise, thereby upholding the principle of clear communication operating as an enabler.

  • Crucial Aspect: Time Management

Readers may view the idea of time management as a primary component of campaigns designed to develop inter-office Goal-setting. In this scenario, teams may focus significant levels of effort on high-priority projects and tasks, for instance. This aspect of goal-setting must gain traction with team leaders, managers, associates, and senior staffers. In addition, operators of large projects that operate in phases across different work locations must explore/adhere to various best practices that uphold time management. We could ideate on this concept inside the spaces of flow-based diagrams; subsequent versions of these initiatives could feature higher aspects of time management, such as directing trained resources to operate the initial stages of new projects. In addition, organizations could explore the concept of inter-office goal-setting as an effective progression that merges with the larger objectives endorsed by the modern organization.

  • The Primacy of Metrics

Personnel that steers the performance of organizations may design a range of metrics as part of inter-office Goal-setting initiatives. Metrics offer a method of quantifying work performance, displaying information through the agency of virtual scoreboards, helping enlighten teams regarding their progress, and helping develop an informed clientele. Flowcharts can assist organizations to design the components of various metrics, build synergy with owners of work processes, offer a high-level view of work over differentiated timelines, and other such support.  In addition, the effect rendition of metrics can build transparency into the mechanics of work processes, and instruct associates on techniques to improve participation and performance. Therefore, the idea of inter-office goal-setting may include the devising of multiple sets of metrics or custom targets designed in tune with the requirements of projects.

  • Ideating on Timelines

Any exercise in inter-office Goal-setting must include cascading timelines appended to various stages of projects. A preliminary step may include onboarding various stakeholders and gaining their confidence in the efficacy of this device. Designers may follow certain norms in terms of revising deadlines as appropriate, creating modules that share information among stakeholders in real-time, and similar norms. Timelines act as an informal spur that drives the team to complete work projects, and innovate on the fly, so to say. A subsidiary set of activities may include re-allocating analysts and staff persons to different sections of projects; ancillary activities may include the deployment of specialists and consultants as part of the organizational resolve to adhere to deadlines. Various lines of these strategies could be evolved within the spaces of flowcharts, as a step to attain inter-office goal-setting.

  • Why Feedback?

Feedback loops, when integrated into the processes of an organization, can act like smart devices that enlighten the idea of inter-office goal-setting. These devices would serve as knowledge mechanisms that enable/empower workers to review the quality of work and allow supervisors to provide constructive inputs. Feedback can be sourced from clients, co-workers, colleagues, supervisors, consultants, among others. Additionally, organizations may invest in the development of multi-layer feedback loops that enrich the quality of information traveling in these structures. Feedback mechanisms can be melded into quality control systems, allowing smarter outcomes to take shape. A flow-based diagram can help designers outline the structure, stance, and content of feedback loops – building the stage for enhancing the idea of inter-office goal-setting initiatives and practices.

  • The Value of Information Sharing

Information sharing may include a wide spectrum of connected actions that disperse into a matrix encompassing entire organizations. Therefore, the ideas of sharing information as an essential activity, a mode of evolution for organizations, and as an adhesive that reinforces the integrity of various structures of organizations, make sense. Hence, corporate strategists may mold the stance of inter-office goal-setting to include information sharing at various levels, between different entities and stakeholders, as also various elements that populate the external environment of organizations. It would help to analyze the nature of information and the outcomes that flow from the effective dispersion of data. A highly-rated, custom-developed information-sharing mechanism may distinguish the proceedings when strategists participate in inter-office goal-setting exercises.

  • To Conclude

Readings of these paragraphs can enrich/enlighten our thoughts on setting goals for different units/sections of organizations. Such initiatives are special ongoing projects, ones that exercise the brains of analysts and may reveal new horizons in organizational dynamics. The use of structured constructs, such as flowcharts, can boost ideation on new lines; the imagery generated by these constructs can serve as a precursor to radical departures from conventional thoughts on goal-setting. Designers may develop versions of flowcharts to survey the nature of the modern organization, and delineate the crucial nature of goal-setting in attaining outstanding sets of deliverables. Alternatively, designers of diagrams could fashion new expressions of connected illustrations in a bid to re-invent the techniques of designing goals and objectives.

Further, analysts may ideate on establishing connections between the strategic objectives of organizations and goal-setting at local levels. This may entail complex lines of ideation that could flow from assessments of various factors such as market conditions, the expectations of clients, the competitive edge of organizations, the availability of skilled human power, thoughts on the effective deployment of available technologies, and other factors. It is possible to disassemble legacy versions of the flowchart (or similar blueprints) to develop detailed diagrams and sketches that address the headline topic. This initiative could encourage designers to develop microcosms of connected structures within master editions of flowcharts. The experience and education that flows from these exercises could elevate our understanding of goal-setting initiatives, and their impact on the development and fortunes of organizations.

Create interactive decision trees for customer service management, cold call scripts or self-service. Improve sales performance metrics and customer delight across your call centers.

Interactive Decision Tree