Select Page

“Keep it simple and focus on what matters. Don’t let yourself be overwhelmed.” – Confucius

Decomposition – when viewed as a physical, chemical, biological process – offers an interesting view of the aftermath that follows natural systems and processes. This phenomenon occurs in many aspects of the earth’s natural environment, as also in the realms and domains of the extra-terrestrial. We may view decomposition as essential/interminable sets of action – ones that are built into the nature of matter itself, ones that manifest ceaselessly in terrestrial processes, and as ones that promote the formation of new entities, novel systems, and higher levels of functionality and sophistication.

An examination of decomposition – in terms of analytical paradigms – points us to the many possibilities that flow from said phenomenon. For instance, creators may work at keeping flowcharts simple through the minimal use of visual devices, the application of design sense, and an elevated creative sensibility that discounts all manner of the extraneous. Such actions exert significant downstream effects in terms of promoting higher levels of comprehension among readers, thereby helping spotlight the active merits of keeping flowcharts simple.

New advances in technique and visual design could assist creators in the project of keeping flowcharts simple. For instance, connecting arrows inside flowcharts could be a manifestation of process mechanics. Such thinking expands the creative canvas, thereby empowering designers to reduce clutter/visual complexity inside illustrations. In addition, creators may view connectors as intermediate stages – ones that depict the processing of activity enshrined in early stages of process operation. The visual signature of connectors could also undergo evolution as part of a continuing narrative that underlines structural simplicity. Such techniques can promote a lean approach to flowchart creation, thereby generating visually elegant instances of blueprint-based illustrations.

The idea of nesting sub-stages inside a headline stage of process represents steps forward in campaigns themed to attain visual clarity. This approach to keeping flowcharts simple allows designers to compress multiple steps inside the space of a defined visual canvas. For instance, commercial/scientific and technological processes that contain a plethora of multiple stages could find adequate expression through said technique. Additional action that complements this process could emerge when creators append individual, upper-case alphabets to alternative stages/sub-stages depicted inside flowcharts. This idea removes the burdens associated with heavy text-based representation, thereby allowing creators to register success in keeping flowcharts simple. A combination of these ideas may help boost simplicity in matters of visual representation.

Multiple editions of flowchart – when sequenced into a specific order – can enable the mission of keeping flowcharts simple. This technique hinges on a distributive model – wherein different segments of process are positioned within disparate diagrams. Such a stance enables creators to find balance in their attempts to depict process mechanics inside a visual canvas. The positioning of operative elements inside multiple stages portrays the power of visual distribution, thereby helping the headline mission of keeping flowcharts simple. Further, an information-driven, in-diagram device – such as legend – could assist designers’ efforts to excise complexity from flowcharts. The ideation and subsequent implementation of such techniques – undertaken on a calibrated scale – may encourage new expressions of modern blueprints to emerge in contemporary design.

A fixed set of variable shapes imparts discipline (in acts of rendering) and boosts geometry (of visual representation). In line with this assertion, designers could work with classical shapes such as squares, circles, triangles, and rectangles. The limited choice of shapes enables the primary objective of simplicity, thereby driving momentum in keeping flowcharts simple. We may note this stance also enables designers to establish a steady dialogue with readers/various stakeholders, thereby implementing high degrees of certainty in the creative process. Additionally, a steady endorsement of such stances helps expand sets of best practices that attend the design/creation of modern flowcharts. This, in turn, enables progress in campaigns that encourage adoption of best practices in design activity.

The traditional concept of spatial expanse may undergo a form of revision when designers align with objectives of keeping flowcharts simple. We may view this stance in light of design initiatives that seek to implement hybrid illustrative models that hinge on both the horizontal and the vertical. Such a technique helps designers ideate on/build extended depictions of process on the horizontal plane, while replicating this motif to construct graded instances of vertical illustration. The outcomes could be seen as an expression of simplicity, a key attribute that can assist in keeping flowcharts simple. Additionally, such stances can help develop interesting facets inside flowcharts, thereby reinforcing the utility of diagrams in the realm of contemporary construction/ideation.

Considered deployments of special elements – such as primary colors in appropriate locations inside flowcharts can enable the mission of keeping flowcharts simple. Tints and colors represent an aspect of design initiative that can elevate scope of context/meaning contained within illustrations. For instance, business planners could deploy colors to spotlight elements of strategy, modes of execution, timeframes of observation, techniques of evaluation, and methods of refinement – among others. The application of colors allows diagrams to emerge through different segments, thereby imposing a semblance of visual simplicity and promoting the guided transmission of information. Additionally, such illustrations can help amplify meaning in eyes of readers, thereby creating systematic dialogue between designers and readers.

A list of serialized numbers could be deployed in blank spaces as part of attempts to simulate the visual form/outline of flowcharts. Over-sized numbers could dominate this illustration, and convey meaning through brief segments of text appended to said numbers. Such a technique inaugurates a brand new system of depicting tiers of information, thereby empowering creators pursuing the idea of keeping flowcharts simple. This stance could also help designers to build initial versions of complex ideas through illustrations. A collection of such diagrams bears potential to amplify acts of disseminating ideas through visual media. In addition, creators could append alphabets to serial numbers in a bid to accommodate extended lines of information inside flowcharts. This version of simplicity can power information campaigns aimed for consumption in, for instance, expansive landscapes of the public domain.

Designers/creators that prize the artistic impulse could make attempts at keeping flowcharts simple by adopting techniques of freestyle illustration. Such a stance allows said individuals to fashion diagrams outside the norms of conventional design methodology. Such a stance encourages the immediate to coalesce with the primary objectives that animate long-term design projects. For instance, architects of new public transportation systems could – to an extent – eschew computer-driven design technologies and manually sketch ideas/concepts on sheets of paper. Such a stance promotes the free flow of ideas, remains receptive to innovation, and spotlights an evolving aspect of new design sensibility. Such stances could be a primary source of movement toward fresh ideas that could trigger ongoing evolution of best practices.

These lines of exploration can spur original thought toward the prized objective of keeping flowcharts simple. The idea of simplicity could be stated in terms of the absence of (manifest) complexity; extended versions of the idea could accommodate specific themes that may be native to systems, techniques, and processes that take shape in future eras. Therefore, designers must endorse a broad concept of simplicity – one that embraces pure functionality inside systems/processes, as also the aesthetics that promote a convergence between flowcharts and the cherished objectives that inform the march of human civilization.