Using Flowchart to Create a Business Contingency Plan

“Business continuity is becoming a major issue for companies of all sizes. The message is finally getting through; any company that is prepared to risk letting their customers down or gamble with the needs of their employees is going to pay a heavy penalty at some time – we need a comprehensive platform where we can learn about solutions in this vitally important area.” – John Sharp

A contingency plan comprises a central part of modern corporate risk management practices- such plans aim to minimize the impact of unforeseen events and offer businesses a framework for resuming normal operations after a crisis. Contingency planning also represents preparations to negotiate quantifiable crises and empower organizations to deal with sudden disruptions. An intelligent business contingency plan can prepare companies for problems such as the loss of data, staff, customers, or business relationships. Flowchart diagrams can admirably assist business operators plan and frame a business contingency plan. The structured design of such illustrations allow businesses to explore the nature of disruptive events and create an appropriate response to sudden disruption.

Planning and implementing a business contingency plan in the visual medium demands a relentless focus on facts and scenarios. Flowcharts, when deployed for the purpose, can outline the stalwart actions for such plans. Such a diagram can describe the core risks that could threaten the normal operations of a business enterprise; in line with this, such risks could comprise the heart of a flowchart. The stages that surround the central proposition could include various threat scenarios; the elements required to implement remedial actions; a command structure that can discharge the various actions ensconced within a business contingency plan; reporting, measurement, and auditing mechanisms; the costs of implementing remedial measures, etc. The final diagram can serve as a roadmap that helps salvage the core essentials of business operations in the event of sudden, severe disruptions.

Risk management represents the motive force that drives the creation of a modern business contingency plan. In line with this, business operators must envisage every risk that could impact business operations of a commercial organization. A flowchart can spotlight each risk inside a certain section of the illustration; lines emanating from these risks can indicate the initial actions to be undertaken to contain each risk. In addition, designers can assign certain values to each risk factor in a bid to quantify its potential impact on business operations. The emerging picture creates a clear image of the many risks potentially faced by a business operation. That said, business operators could consult with risk management experts as part of efforts to boost the emerging business contingency plan and sketch failsafe mechanisms inside the flowchart. This could lead to prudent implementation and a deeper endorsement of the plan across all levels of the sponsor organization.

Timelines are necessary to ensure the viability and success of a business contingency plan. Flowcharts designed to frame such plans must display timelines for each action in the immediate aftermath of a disruptive event. The timeline for each event may differ in tune with the nature of a disruption; this essential difference must reflect inside the flowchart. For instance, reaction times must be appropriate to disruptive events such as data breaches, a leak of hazardous materials inside business premises, discovery of a theft of business assets, injuries sustained by employees at work, etc. Each timeline must guide the actions of organizational members, as also specifically designated groups of employees. We note such a flowchart can find completion as an expansive diagram, one that encases critical components of a business contingency plan and spurs the recovery process in the event of a mishap.

Clarity of purpose is necessary to animate contingency plans inside the modern organization. A modern business contingency plan hinges on key agents discharging their assigned duties in a timely manner. Flowcharts designed for the purpose must therefore, clearly outline key agents and their expected reactions to a disruptive event. The various stages inside the illustration must encase information pertaining to scenarios, triggers, the ideal response, the ‘who‘ and the ‘what‘. Clear text, when positioned inside these stages, instructs each agent of his or her responsibilities, thereby firming the sinews of a business contingency plan. We note business sponsors must broadcast such a flowchart to all levels of the organization with the aim of building deep awareness, as also to sharpen the organizational response to sudden events. In addition, such a flowchart must delineate back-up personnel that can ably support the efforts of primary agents.

Communication can help resolve an adverse situation that could threaten disruptions to a business organization. Therefore, every business contingency plan must delineate lines of clear communication in a crisis. These lines must populate a flowchart and connect different levels starting from the C-suite; in addition, these lines must connect various levels of stakeholders, vendors, suppliers, market regulators, the press, and all manner of clientele. Colors, when imparted to these lines of communication, could help determine priority in times of crises. We note such a stance can help build trust and confidence in a brand and allow it to evade the damaging outcomes of mismanaged communication. In addition, this approach defeats the raft of rumors, innuendo, inconsistencies, half-truths, and exaggerations that may mar organizational reputation and degrade a company’s response to unexpected events.

The criteria that determine the severity of a crisis must find a prominent position in any flowchart that describes a business contingency plan. These criterions hold a central position in defining the response of an organization; hence, must be mapped to a series of responses that issue from the organizational structure. For instance, an operator of a logistics and warehousing business could create a range of classifiers that include minor damage to business facilities; intermediate disruptions in business operations owing to inclement weather; dangers arising from civil strife; risks posed by changes in supplier behavior; severe risks that stem from extensive degradation of warehousing facilities, etc. The flowchart must encase each risk and define a graded response from the business organization. We note additions, refinements, and new strategies that enter such an illustration could reinforce the business contingency plan of said operator. Further, said plan gains heft when the operator incorporates additional risk factors stemming from scenarios that center on cyber espionage, Acts of God, fluctuations in global currency markets, etc.

Employee attrition poses a certain level of threat to modern businesses. The departure of a skilled employee may disrupt scheduled client deliveries, thereby impacting business relationships and eroding profit margins. A business contingency plan can help the modern organization deal with such scenarios; business managers could fashion a flowchart that outlines training programs, which elevate associates to higher levels of responsibility within the organization. These forms of professional development could enthuse associates, open up a career path for them, and de-risk the business from the threat of employee attrition. We note such a contingency plan could apply to departments within the wider organization, thereby reinforcing corporate ability to limit risks in micro-scenarios. This approach to talent management also enables employers to develop staff management strategies built on logic, probability, and advanced planning mechanisms.

These techniques spotlight why flowcharts help to imagine, develop, and execute a modern business contingency plan. The spatial expanse and flexible structure of a flowchart allows modern businesses to frame and build an infinite number of graded responses to a crisis. Businesses must also work to communicate the essence of such plans to all members of the workforce; this assertion underlines the necessity of flawless execution in contingency planning. Additionally, looking at case studies of legacy crises wherein responders organized a stellar response in containing the risks posed by sudden disruption, would be helpful.

Develop interactive decision trees for troubleshooting, cold calling scripts, medical appointments, or process automation. Enhance sales performance and customer retention across your call centers. Lower costs with customer self-service.

Interactive Decision Tree