Using Flowcharts as a Problem Solving Tool

Furniture represents one of the least appreciated items in the inventory of a modern household. Every quarter of a residential unit bears some form of furniture that imparts form and function to the space. Duvets, sofa sets, tables, chairs, lawn chairs, beds, side tables, wall cabinets, et al are the most common forms of furniture in a modern household. These objects add distinct identity to each space and instill utilitarian value inside a residence. In a certain perspective, modern forms of furniture allow us to mold the physical dimensions of our domestic lives. They serve as a problem solving tool that empower us to gain familiarity with our place of residence. Moreover, the various elements of modern furniture allow us to create signature spaces attuned to our personal tastes and requirements. In a similar vein, we may deploy analytical illustrations as a problem solving tool to navigate a variety of situations in the workplace. The modern flowchart, when allied with flawless logic and expert draughtsmanship, emerges as an interesting means to fashion solutions that decimates the intractable.

An intelligent entrepreneur can construct flowcharts as a problem solving tool to troubleshoot avenues of potential disruption in business operations. Such a flowchart may emerge as a series of stages that include identifying a problem, analyzing its nature, outlining a troubleshoot plan, evaluating the mechanics of said plan, and proceeding with the implementation. En route to the solution, this diagram may alert said entrepreneur to new risks that might erupt following sub-par implementation. This should trigger corrective action that may involve re-setting certain parts of said problem solving tool. Essentially, the illustration allows the entrepreneur to engage in a dialogue with a problem. The interactions between the entrepreneur and the many facets of the flowchart represent the prime locations that may vent a possible solution. On their part, reviewers may assess the content and flow of events inside the diagram and offer suggestions to remedy the problem.

Investments of thought are instrumental in fashioning effective instances of a problem solving tool. In line with this, a business operator may elect to utilize the various stages of a flowchart to ideate and explore the merits of a range of ideas. The cause-and-effect framework, when implemented into said flowchart, helps forge a consensus in terms of addressing an immediate problem. Such a flowchart can be deployed to execute the heavy lifting that must power an ultimate solution. This instance of a problem solving tool may emerge as a complex web of man-made ganglia that feeds into (and takes away from) a variety of moving parts. Designers and business operators must exert themselves to preserve the logic of flows and interactions inside the diagram. The eventual outcomes may include one (or two) ideas that fit the proverbial bill. Once these pass muster, the operator may implement the solution inside extant business processes. A measure of observation and the passage of time should attest to the quality of such solutions.

Troubleshooters and problem solvers must proceed to explore a variety of unknown variables as part of efforts to fashion a problem solving tool. The nature of a contentious situation may merit an aggressive approach that should underlie the analysis of a problem and its depiction on a canvas. To that end, troubleshooters may design illustrations that pose a variety of queries positioned amidst the expanse of a given canvas. The subsequent analysis of the problem may produce multiple stages that emerge as discrete positions, each of which frames a fragment of the looming problem. Each stage can be labelled with the classic matrix underpinned by who, what, where, why, when, which, etc. Once achieved, this matrix emerges as a baseline problem solving tool that should yield a modicum of direction to the final resolution. The responses elicited by the components of said matrix can help cement a solution deemed amenable by business stakeholders. This instance clearly demonstrates the native utility of a flowchart when we consider devising a modern problem solving tool.

Alternatives represent a firm line of defense against the possibility of failure dooming the chances of a primary solution. Also known as, ‘Plan B’, an alternative line of action is critical to ensure the continuity of business and the preservation of an enterprise, among other things. Therefore, the analysts of a problem must devote special efforts to develop a range of credible alternatives in the backdrop of fashioning a primary solution. These alternatives may emerge as standalone lines of action inside the expanse of a flowchart diagram. The reassurance that emanates from alternative strategies may empower business operators to expand their (proverbial) horizons and deploy alternative strategies at different points in the timeline. The designers of flowcharts may assign special colors to alternative lines of action in a bid to differentiate these from the primary solution. A problem solving tool embellished with alternatives gains greater traction with captains of industry and significantly reduces the risks posed by fickle variables.

Implementation may represent the problematic last-mile when we consider outcomes generated by a problem solving tool. In response, designers may elect to confer with process experts (and quality champions) to devise an illustration outside of the master flowchart. The many stages and limbs of this child illustration may describe multiple stages of a top-notch implementation. The stages, when appended to copious notes, indicate the veritable flight path (so to say) that leads to the perfect touchdown of a (hypothetical) flying vehicle. The details of said stages may include the many ways in which the solution may impact various aspects (and stages) that populate the master flowchart diagram. On their part, readers of the child illustration gain a thorough understanding of this version of a problem solving tool while appreciating its likely impact on general outcomes. For instance, a financial services institution that embraces the above approach may seek to devise multiple child strategies that lessen the impact of change on customer relationships, preserve the integrity of vendor management systems, and promote the commercially competitive stance of the institution in open markets.

The above paragraphs have illustrated the many possibilities of deploying flowcharts as a modern expression of the problem solving tool. Observers note certain fundamental revisions may help the humble blueprint to attain the status of a celebrity troubleshooter. However, every tool bears strengths and limitations; therefore, the designers and creators of flowchart diagrams must work to promote their strengths in the service of seeking an ultimate resolution. Questions and queries that arise from such illustrations deserve the spotlight as part of the drive to attain resolution. Readers and reviewers must remain flexible when interpreting the scope of such queries, while mulling various responses. Further, designers may also invest effort to refine the visual appearance of such illustrations. A design approach underpinned by data and information can work the proverbial wonders in terms of reinforcing faith in the efficacy of such illustrations. In addition, digital technologies can be harnessed to bolster such uni-dimensional tools of business. The digitally created editions of such flowcharts can be transmitted to reviewers in different points of the globe, thereby adding to the various flavors of feedback. Further, landmark versions of such problem solving tools can serve as templates that point the way to the evolution of these illustrations.

Create interactive decision trees for customer service management, cold call scripts or self-service. Improve sales performance metrics and customer delight across your call centers.

Interactive Decision Tree