Business Decision Mapping with Flowcharts

“It doesn’t matter which side of the fence you get off on sometimes. What matters most is getting off. You cannot make progress without making decisions.” Jim Rohn

Key actions such as decisions play a central role in the survival, sustenance, expansion, and success of modern business enterprises. Corporate leaders and business managers that need to arrive at decisions have leveraged a host of systems, paradigms, and techniques to arrive at balanced decisions. The act of business decision mapping represents one such technique that relies on heavy visualization of a decision. Generic technologies and specialized tools such as flowcharts can be deployed to spur business decision mapping in a variety of contemporary contexts. The structure and content of such illustrations may vary but the arrival at a valid decision remains the constant intent. Such an approach to business decision mapping involves the use of diagrams to help articulate (and work through) the decision problem, from initial recognition of the need through to communication of the decision and the thinking behind it.

The expansion of an idea could represent the visual motif when commercial operators execute business decision mapping through flowcharts. This assertion posits a main stage located at the left margin of a flowchart diagram. Subsequently, this diagram expands into a range of queries, notes of interrogation, inputs, situation analysis, and possible outcomes that occupy a range of vertically stacked stages at the opposite end of the diagram. Intelligent operators may elect to add a variety of points that detail the rationale behind a series of outcomes depicted at the terminal edge of said illustration. This attempt at business decision mapping hinges on the use of information and its positioning inside a flowchart; additional elements can resonate inside the illustration in the form of layers of justification that validate each possible outcome. We note a systematic approach is critical to breathe life into this technique of business decision mapping in modern times.

A range of parameters must find consideration inside a flowchart that spurs business decision mapping activities. Business leaders can select these parameters in line with context and necessity. From a design point of view, such an endeavor can emerge as a hexagonal flowchart on the drawing board. The content inside this illustration can include a definition of the problem statement, the specification of a range of alternatives, the qualitative costs involved in undertaking each alternative, the quantitative costs thereof, the benefits offered by each alternative, the negatives thereof, etc. This attempt at business decision mapping emerges in the form of a circular illustration, the final representation of which may prompt the relevant actors to seek co-relationships between varied lines of content. Data from ongoing business operations may impart critical momentum to such an exercise. Additionally, business operators may include a range of outcomes or decisions, each of which remains open to interrogation and re-assessment.

Large buckets of information carry outsize relevance in the evolving art of business decision mapping. These silos of information must necessarily be specific to an industry whose captains must consider different factors prior to arriving at a business decision. For instance, the manufacturer of confectionary products could initiate the design of a flowchart that spotlights factors that drive customer purchases. Pursuant to this, the illustration may feature stages such as quality of the product, taste, nutrition value, price points, competition, and the visual appeal of product packaging. These master stages can issue various sub-stages that analyze the impact of each stage on outcomes. A close examination of this visual document can help said manufacturer design business plans based on the decisions. We note this instance of business decision mapping emerges as a repository of granular information that drives the growth and expansion of said enterprise.

The principle of accountability validates, to a large measure, the decisions arrived at by a business decision mapping initiative. This implies key stages of the decision-making process must be appended to specific personnel. Illustrations that visually describe said initiative must therefore spotlight individual accountability in contrast to the notions of collective responsibility. In line with this, a flowchart that describes the business decision mapping process must make the proverbial room to accommodate the names of personnel. This implies collaboration between these actors in the interests of driving a successful decision. It also implies the assumption of performance criteria that would assess the efficacy of said actors in realizing the project. These factors, when described visually, may contribute to the creation of a dense illustration that depicts the inputs into business decision mapping activities. However, the descriptive nature of such an illustration may stress the mental faculties of readers and reviewers.

Moral algebra, first propounded by Benjamin Franklin, can assist in driving momentum in modern projects of business decision mapping. This technique hinges on two dimensions: advantages and disadvantages of a certain course of action. This simplistic approach may appear deficient to business analysts, but may help deal with elements such as uncertainty and time pressures. Pursuant to this, an organization may invest in flowcharts that rest on twin, vertically stacked sets of stages. These stages, when populated by relevant information, can help guide organizational actors to a balanced decision. This model works on the principle of elimination that excises sub-par courses of action en route to the final decision. Therefore, the flowchart could manifest as a tree that rests on two trunks. It is interesting to note modern decision-making software products can help enrich and inform this technique of business decision mapping. Observers note this approach tends to reduce the time taken to reach decisions when compared to unstructured approaches undertaken to attain said objective.

Vulnerabilities and opportunities represent key elements that can assist in business decision mapping projects. We note this technique essentially focuses on said elements as decision makers that dominate an appropriate illustration. In line with this, designers can position these elements in a central location inside the flowchart. In this model, each bucket of content must be evaluated against the perceived vulnerabilities and opportunities, thereby creating a dialogue that spurs decision making. A business operator, for instance, may elect to enumerate the vulnerabilities and weigh these against the opportunities offered by a certain scenario. This complex approach to business decision mapping can be informed by the inclusion of new and emerging trends that could distinguish a certain market. In response, business operators may seek to unearth various opportunities that may be remain latent. Further, the modern entrepreneur may investigate manifest vulnerabilities and seek the means to turn these into business opportunities. This instance clearly spotlights the utility of deploying flowcharts in business decision mapping ventures.

These paragraphs have sought to examine the many applications of flowcharts and inter-linked illustrations in the pursuit of mapping business decisions. The sheer integrity of these diagrams in terms of depicting various hues of information makes them a priceless tool in the hands of organizational actors. These illustrations also serve to depict the nuanced complexities that attend modern decision-making activities, while promoting the use of collective wisdom to drive a decision. In addition, the wide expanse of a flowchart can illuminate the business decision mapping process with fluid inputs that may alter the course of a decision(s). Interestingly, such flowcharts can ignite various thought processes in the minds of the interested observer. The interaction between the diagram and the gray cells of an observer can fuel innovative decisions that could lift the fortunes of a commercial operator.

Create interactive decision trees for customer service management, cold call scripts or self-service. Improve sales performance metrics and customer delight across your call centers.

Interactive Decision Tree